hot dog: is unhealthy

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents animal fat
Weight: 0.72
, fast food
Weight: 0.70
, favorite
Weight: 0.68
, junk food
Weight: 0.67
, item
Weight: 0.67
Siblings dog food
Weight: 0.38
, pet food
Weight: 0.36
, chocolate bar
Weight: 0.34
, pizza
Weight: 0.34
, twinkies
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is unhealthy 1.00
be unhealthy in hindi 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.61
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(junk food, is unhealthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(hot dog, is unhealthy)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(fast food, is unhealthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(hot dog, is unhealthy)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(junk food, be unhealthy in hindi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(hot dog, is unhealthy)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(hot dog, is unhealthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(fast food, is unhealthy)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(hot dog, is unhealthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(junk food, be unhealthy in hindi)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(hot dog, is unhealthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(junk food, is unhealthy)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.57
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(hot dog, is unhealthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(fast food, is unhealthy)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(hot dog, is unhealthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(junk food, is unhealthy)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(hot dog, is unhealthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be unhealthy in hindi)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(hot dog, is unhealthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(pizza, is unhealthy)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(junk food, is unhealthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(hot dog, is unhealthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(hot dog, is unhealthy)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(fast food, is unhealthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(hot dog, is unhealthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(hot dog, is unhealthy)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(junk food, be unhealthy in hindi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(hot dog, is unhealthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(hot dog, is unhealthy)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(hot dog, is unhealthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(pizza, is unhealthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(pizza, is unhealthy)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(hot dog, is unhealthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(hot dog, is unhealthy)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(hot dog, is unhealthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(hot dog, is unhealthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(hot dog, is unhealthy)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(hot dog, is unhealthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(hot dog, is unhealthy)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.50
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(hot dog, is unhealthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(fast food, is unhealthy)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(hot dog, is unhealthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(junk food, is unhealthy)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(hot dog, is unhealthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(junk food, be unhealthy in hindi)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(hot dog, is unhealthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(pizza, is unhealthy)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(hot dog, is unhealthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(fast food, is unhealthy)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(hot dog, is unhealthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(junk food, be unhealthy in hindi)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(hot dog, is unhealthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(junk food, is unhealthy)