hot sauce: relate to pandering

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents sauce
Weight: 0.71
, seasoning
Weight: 0.69
, spice
Weight: 0.66
, thing
Weight: 0.64
, herb
Weight: 0.62
Siblings tabasco sauce
Weight: 0.87
, tabasco
Weight: 0.70
, apple sauce
Weight: 0.41
, spaghetti sauce
Weight: 0.40
, tartar sauce
Weight: 0.40

Related properties

Property Similarity
relate to pandering 1.00
relate to black pandering 0.98

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.61
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(sauce, relate to pandering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(hot sauce, relate to pandering)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(sauce, relate to black pandering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(hot sauce, relate to pandering)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(hot sauce, relate to pandering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(sauce, relate to black pandering)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(hot sauce, relate to pandering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(sauce, relate to pandering)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.50
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(hot sauce, relate to pandering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(sauce, relate to pandering)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(hot sauce, relate to pandering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(sauce, relate to black pandering)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(sauce, relate to pandering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(hot sauce, relate to pandering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(hot sauce, relate to pandering)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(sauce, relate to black pandering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(hot sauce, relate to pandering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(hot sauce, relate to pandering)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(hot sauce, relate to pandering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(hot sauce, relate to pandering)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(hot sauce, relate to pandering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(hot sauce, relate to black pandering)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(hot sauce, relate to pandering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(hot sauce, relate to black pandering)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(hot sauce, relate to pandering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(hot sauce, relate to black pandering)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(hot sauce, relate to pandering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(hot sauce, relate to black pandering)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(hot sauce, relate to pandering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(hot sauce, relate to pandering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(hot sauce, relate to pandering)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(hot sauce, relate to pandering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(hot sauce, relate to pandering)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(hot sauce, relate to pandering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(sauce, relate to pandering)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(hot sauce, relate to pandering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(sauce, relate to black pandering)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(hot sauce, relate to pandering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(sauce, relate to pandering)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(hot sauce, relate to pandering) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(sauce, relate to black pandering)