hotel room: feel damp

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents hotel
Weight: 0.83
, home
Weight: 0.69
, room
Weight: 0.68
, apartment
Weight: 0.68
Siblings bedroom
Weight: 0.64
, spa
Weight: 0.59
, suite
Weight: 0.57
, laundry room
Weight: 0.43
, dining room
Weight: 0.42

Related properties

Property Similarity
feel damp 1.00
has state damp 0.94
is humid 0.80
is dry 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(room, is humid)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(hotel room, feel damp)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(room, has state damp)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(hotel room, feel damp)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(hotel room, feel damp)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(room, has state damp)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(hotel room, feel damp)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(room, is humid)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(hotel room, feel damp)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(room, has state damp)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(hotel room, feel damp)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(room, is humid)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(hotel room, feel damp)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(bedroom, is dry)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(hotel room, feel damp)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(bedroom, is humid)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(room, is humid)
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(hotel room, feel damp)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(hotel room, feel damp)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(room, has state damp)
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(hotel room, feel damp)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(hotel room, feel damp)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(hotel room, feel damp)
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(bedroom, is dry)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(bedroom, is dry)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(hotel room, feel damp)
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(bedroom, is humid)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(bedroom, is humid)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(hotel room, feel damp)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(hotel room, feel damp)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(hotel room, feel damp)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(hotel room, has state damp)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(hotel room, feel damp)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(hotel room, has state damp)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(hotel room, feel damp)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(hotel room, has state damp)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(hotel room, feel damp)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(hotel room, has state damp)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(hotel room, feel damp)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(hotel room, is dry)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(hotel room, feel damp)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(hotel room, is dry)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(hotel room, feel damp)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(hotel room, is humid)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(hotel room, feel damp)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(hotel room, is dry)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(hotel room, feel damp)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(hotel room, is humid)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(hotel room, feel damp)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(hotel room, is humid)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(hotel room, feel damp)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(hotel room, is dry)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(hotel room, feel damp)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(hotel room, is humid)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(hotel room, feel damp)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(hotel room, feel damp)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(hotel room, feel damp)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(hotel room, feel damp)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(hotel room, feel damp)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(hotel room, feel damp)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(room, has state damp)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(hotel room, feel damp)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(room, is humid)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(hotel room, feel damp)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(bedroom, is dry)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(hotel room, feel damp)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(bedroom, is humid)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(hotel room, feel damp)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(room, has state damp)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(hotel room, feel damp)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(room, is humid)