hotel: be at resort

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents tourist
Weight: 0.67
, airport
Weight: 0.65
, park
Weight: 0.63
, stay
Weight: 0.61
Siblings hotel room
Weight: 0.83
, spa
Weight: 0.68
, bed
Weight: 0.63
, downtown
Weight: 0.62
, subway station
Weight: 0.61

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at resort 1.00
be at hot spring resort area 0.87
be at hotel 0.80
be find in hotel 0.78
be at hotel room 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(tourist, be at hot spring resort area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(hotel, be at resort)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(hotel, be at resort) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(tourist, be at hot spring resort area)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(hotel, be at resort) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(tourist, be at hot spring resort area)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(hotel, be at resort) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(spa, be at resort)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(hotel, be at resort) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(bed, be at hotel)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(hotel, be at resort) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(hotel room, be at resort)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(hotel, be at resort) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(bed, be find in hotel)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(hotel, be at resort) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(bed, be at hotel room)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(tourist, be at hot spring resort area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(hotel, be at resort) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(hotel, be at resort)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(hotel, be at resort) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(hotel room, be at resort) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(hotel room, be at resort)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(hotel, be at resort) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(spa, be at resort) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(spa, be at resort)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(hotel, be at resort) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(bed, be at hotel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(bed, be at hotel)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(hotel, be at resort) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(bed, be find in hotel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(bed, be find in hotel)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(hotel, be at resort) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(bed, be at hotel room) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(bed, be at hotel room)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(hotel, be at resort) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(hotel, be at resort)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(hotel, be at resort) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(hotel, be at resort) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(hotel, be at resort)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(hotel, be at resort) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(hotel, be at resort)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(hotel, be at resort) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(tourist, be at hot spring resort area)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(hotel, be at resort) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(hotel room, be at resort)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(hotel, be at resort) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(spa, be at resort)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(hotel, be at resort) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(bed, be at hotel room)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(hotel, be at resort) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(bed, be find in hotel)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(hotel, be at resort) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(bed, be at hotel)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(hotel, be at resort) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(tourist, be at hot spring resort area)