hotel: be at touristic area

Related concepts

Parents	tourist Weight: 0.67 , airport Weight: 0.65 , park Weight: 0.63 , stay Weight: 0.61
Siblings	hotel room Weight: 0.83 , spa Weight: 0.68 , bed Weight: 0.63 , downtown Weight: 0.62 , subway station Weight: 0.61

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be at touristic area	1.00
be used to tourist	0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Remarkable(hotel, be at touristic area) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(hotel room, be used to tourist)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.48

Plausible(hotel, be at touristic area) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

Remarkable(hotel room, be used to tourist) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Plausible(hotel room, be used to tourist)

Salient implies Plausible

0.16

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.48

Plausible(hotel, be at touristic area) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Salient(hotel, be at touristic area)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.85

Salient(hotel, be at touristic area) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Typical(hotel, be at touristic area) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Remarkable(hotel, be at touristic area)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.48

Plausible(hotel, be at touristic area) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Typical(hotel, be at touristic area)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Remarkable(hotel, be at touristic area) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Typical(hotel room, be used to tourist)