hotel: be in miami

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents tourist
Weight: 0.67
, office building
Weight: 0.66
, airport
Weight: 0.65
, park
Weight: 0.63
Siblings hotel room
Weight: 0.83
, spa
Weight: 0.68
, bed
Weight: 0.63
, downtown
Weight: 0.62
, subway station
Weight: 0.61

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in miami 1.00
be in tampa 0.83
be in chicago 0.82
is nyc 0.81
be in boston 0.80
be in philadelphia 0.79
be in seattle 0.79
be in usa 0.78
be in mexico 0.78
be in conroe texas 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(hotel, be in miami) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(hotel room, be in boston)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(hotel, be in miami) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(hotel room, be in boston) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(hotel room, be in boston)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(hotel, be in miami) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(hotel, be in miami)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(hotel, be in miami) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(hotel, be in conroe texas)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(hotel, be in miami) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(hotel, be in conroe texas)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(hotel, be in miami) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(hotel, be in conroe texas)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(hotel, be in miami) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(hotel, be in conroe texas)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(hotel, be in miami) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(hotel, be in mexico)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(hotel, be in miami) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(hotel, be in mexico)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(hotel, be in miami) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(hotel, be in mexico)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(hotel, be in miami) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(hotel, be in mexico)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(hotel, be in miami) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(hotel, be in miami) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(hotel, be in miami)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(hotel, be in miami) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(hotel, be in miami)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(hotel, be in miami) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(hotel room, be in boston)