hound: have loose skin

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dog
Weight: 0.64
, film
Weight: 0.52
, creature
Weight: 0.52
, breed
Weight: 0.51
, terrier
Weight: 0.45
Siblings beagle
Weight: 0.62
, basset
Weight: 0.41
, cocker spaniel
Weight: 0.37
, labrador retriever
Weight: 0.36
, bloodhound
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
have loose skin 1.00
has physical part skin 0.81
have long hair 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(hound, have loose skin)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(bloodhound, have loose skin)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(hound, have loose skin)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(bloodhound, has physical part skin)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(hound, have loose skin)
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(bloodhound, have loose skin)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(bloodhound, have loose skin)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(hound, have loose skin)
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(bloodhound, has physical part skin)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(bloodhound, has physical part skin)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(hound, have loose skin)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(hound, have loose skin)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(hound, have loose skin)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(hound, has physical part skin)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(hound, have loose skin)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(hound, have long hair)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(hound, have loose skin)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(hound, has physical part skin)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(hound, have loose skin)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(hound, has physical part skin)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(hound, have loose skin)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(hound, has physical part skin)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(hound, have loose skin)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(hound, have long hair)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(hound, have loose skin)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(hound, have long hair)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(hound, have loose skin)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(hound, have long hair)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(hound, have loose skin)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(hound, have loose skin)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(hound, have loose skin)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(hound, have loose skin)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(hound, have loose skin)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(hound, have loose skin)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(bloodhound, has physical part skin)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(hound, have loose skin)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(bloodhound, have loose skin)