house music: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents house
Weight: 0.58
, influence
Weight: 0.57
, dance
Weight: 0.54
, feeling
Weight: 0.52
, shit
Weight: 0.50
Siblings white house
Weight: 0.36
, folk music
Weight: 0.35
, mansion
Weight: 0.34
, farmhouse
Weight: 0.34
, apartment
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
does feel good 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(shit, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(house music, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(feeling, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(house music, has quality bad)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(influence, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(house music, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(house music, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(influence, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(house music, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(feeling, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(house music, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(shit, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.56
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(house music, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(influence, has quality bad)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(house music, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(feeling, has quality bad)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(house music, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(shit, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(house music, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(mansion, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(house music, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(folk music, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(shit, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(house music, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(house music, has quality bad)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(feeling, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(house music, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(house music, has quality bad)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(influence, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(house music, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(house music, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(house music, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(mansion, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(mansion, has quality bad)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(house music, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(folk music, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(folk music, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(house music, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(house music, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(house music, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(house music, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(house music, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(house music, does feel good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(house music, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(house music, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(house music, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(house music, has quality good)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(house music, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(house music, does feel good)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(house music, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(house music, does feel good)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(house music, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(house music, has quality good)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(house music, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(house music, does feel good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(house music, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(house music, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(house music, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(house music, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(house music, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(house music, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(influence, has quality bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(house music, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(feeling, has quality bad)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(house music, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(shit, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(house music, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(mansion, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(house music, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(folk music, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(house music, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(influence, has quality bad)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(house music, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(feeling, has quality bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(house music, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(shit, has quality bad)