housing: be expensive in california

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents concern
Weight: 0.63
, real estate
Weight: 0.63
, department
Weight: 0.61
, commodity
Weight: 0.60
Siblings condo
Weight: 0.34
, condominium
Weight: 0.34
, townhouse
Weight: 0.33
, real estate agent
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be expensive in california 1.00
be in california expensive 1.00
be in california 0.97
be expensive in oregon 0.85
be expensive in utah 0.85
be in hawaii expensive 0.84
be expensive in connecticut 0.84
be cheap in florida 0.82
be expensive in india 0.82
be cheap in arizona 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(real estate, be expensive in india)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(housing, be expensive in california)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(real estate, be cheap in florida)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(housing, be expensive in california)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(real estate, be expensive in california)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(housing, be expensive in california)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(real estate, be expensive in connecticut)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(housing, be expensive in california)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(housing, be expensive in california)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(real estate, be expensive in california)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(housing, be expensive in california)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(real estate, be expensive in connecticut)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(housing, be expensive in california)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(real estate, be cheap in florida)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(housing, be expensive in california)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(real estate, be expensive in india)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.51
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(housing, be expensive in california)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(real estate, be expensive in california)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(housing, be expensive in california)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(real estate, be expensive in connecticut)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(housing, be expensive in california)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(real estate, be expensive in india)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(housing, be expensive in california)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(real estate, be cheap in florida)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(real estate, be expensive in california)
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(housing, be expensive in california)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(housing, be expensive in california)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(real estate, be expensive in india)
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(housing, be expensive in california)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(housing, be expensive in california)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(real estate, be cheap in florida)
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(housing, be expensive in california)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(housing, be expensive in california)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(real estate, be expensive in connecticut)
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(housing, be expensive in california)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(housing, be expensive in california)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(housing, be expensive in california)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(housing, be expensive in california)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(housing, be expensive in california)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(housing, be in california expensive)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(housing, be expensive in california)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(housing, be in california expensive)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(housing, be expensive in california)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(housing, be in california expensive)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(housing, be expensive in california)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(housing, be in california)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(housing, be expensive in california)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(housing, be in california expensive)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(housing, be expensive in california)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(housing, be in hawaii expensive)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(housing, be expensive in california)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(housing, be in california)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(housing, be expensive in california)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(housing, be in hawaii expensive)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(housing, be expensive in california)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(housing, be in california)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(housing, be expensive in california)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(housing, be in hawaii expensive)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(housing, be expensive in california)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(housing, be in hawaii expensive)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(housing, be expensive in california)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(housing, be expensive in oregon)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(housing, be expensive in california)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(housing, be expensive in oregon)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(housing, be expensive in california)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(housing, be expensive in oregon)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(housing, be expensive in california)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(housing, be in california)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(housing, be expensive in california)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(housing, be expensive in utah)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(housing, be expensive in california)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(housing, be expensive in oregon)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(housing, be expensive in california)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(housing, be cheap in florida)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(housing, be expensive in california)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(housing, be cheap in florida)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(housing, be expensive in california)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(housing, be cheap in florida)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(housing, be expensive in california)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(housing, be cheap in arizona)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(housing, be expensive in california)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(housing, be cheap in florida)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(housing, be expensive in california)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(housing, be expensive in utah)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(housing, be expensive in california)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(housing, be expensive in utah)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(housing, be expensive in california)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(housing, be cheap in arizona)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(housing, be expensive in california)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(housing, be cheap in arizona)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(housing, be expensive in california)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(housing, be cheap in arizona)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(housing, be expensive in california)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(housing, be expensive in utah)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(housing, be expensive in california)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(housing, be expensive in california)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(housing, be expensive in california)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(housing, be expensive in california)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(housing, be expensive in california)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(housing, be expensive in california)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(real estate, be expensive in california)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(housing, be expensive in california)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(real estate, be expensive in connecticut)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(housing, be expensive in california)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(real estate, be cheap in florida)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(housing, be expensive in california)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(real estate, be expensive in india)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(housing, be expensive in california)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(real estate, be expensive in california)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(housing, be expensive in california)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(real estate, be expensive in connecticut)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(housing, be expensive in california)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(real estate, be cheap in florida)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(housing, be expensive in california)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(real estate, be expensive in india)