housing: be expensive in sf

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents concern
Weight: 0.63
, real estate
Weight: 0.63
, department
Weight: 0.61
, commodity
Weight: 0.60
Siblings condo
Weight: 0.34
, condominium
Weight: 0.34
, townhouse
Weight: 0.33
, real estate agent
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be expensive in sf 1.00
be insane in sf bay area 0.88
be cheaper than condos 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(housing, be expensive in sf) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(townhouse, be cheaper than condos)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(housing, be expensive in sf) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(townhouse, be cheaper than condos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(townhouse, be cheaper than condos)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(housing, be expensive in sf) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(housing, be expensive in sf)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(housing, be expensive in sf) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(housing, be insane in sf bay area)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(housing, be expensive in sf) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(housing, be insane in sf bay area)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(housing, be expensive in sf) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(housing, be insane in sf bay area)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(housing, be expensive in sf) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(housing, be insane in sf bay area)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(housing, be expensive in sf) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(housing, be expensive in sf) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(housing, be expensive in sf)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(housing, be expensive in sf) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(housing, be expensive in sf)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(housing, be expensive in sf) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(townhouse, be cheaper than condos)