housing: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents concern
Weight: 0.63
, real estate
Weight: 0.63
, department
Weight: 0.61
, commodity
Weight: 0.60
Siblings condo
Weight: 0.34
, condominium
Weight: 0.34
, townhouse
Weight: 0.33
, real estate agent
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96
is quality 0.91
has quality right 0.90
has quality news 0.79
have bad reputation 0.77
is good job 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(real estate, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(housing, has quality good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(real estate, is good job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(housing, has quality good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(commodity, has quality news) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(housing, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(housing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(real estate, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(housing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(commodity, has quality news)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(housing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(real estate, is good job)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(housing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(real estate, has quality good)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(housing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(real estate, is good job)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(housing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(commodity, has quality news)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(housing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(real estate agent, have bad reputation)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(housing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(condo, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(real estate, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(housing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(housing, has quality good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(commodity, has quality news) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(housing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(housing, has quality good)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(real estate, is good job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(housing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(housing, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(housing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(condo, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(condo, has quality bad)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(housing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(real estate agent, have bad reputation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(real estate agent, have bad reputation)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(housing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(housing, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(housing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(housing, is quality)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(housing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(housing, is quality)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(housing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(housing, is quality)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(housing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(housing, is quality)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(housing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(housing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(housing, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(housing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(housing, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(housing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(commodity, has quality news)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(housing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(real estate, is good job)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(housing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(real estate, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(housing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(real estate agent, have bad reputation)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(housing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(condo, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(housing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(real estate, has quality good)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(housing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(commodity, has quality news)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(housing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(real estate, is good job)