housing: has state problem

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents concern
Weight: 0.63
, real estate
Weight: 0.63
, department
Weight: 0.61
, commodity
Weight: 0.60
Siblings condo
Weight: 0.34
, condominium
Weight: 0.34
, townhouse
Weight: 0.33
, real estate agent
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state problem 1.00
has state need 0.84
has state job 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.32
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(real estate, has state job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(housing, has state problem)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(housing, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(real estate, has state job)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(housing, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(real estate, has state job)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(real estate, has state job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(housing, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(housing, has state problem)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(housing, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(housing, has state problem)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(housing, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(housing, has state need)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(housing, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(housing, has state need)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(housing, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(housing, has state need)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(housing, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(housing, has state need)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(housing, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(housing, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(housing, has state problem)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(housing, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(housing, has state problem)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(housing, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(real estate, has state job)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(housing, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(real estate, has state job)