houston: be called city

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents texas
Weight: 0.67
, location
Weight: 0.59
, team
Weight: 0.58
, atlanta
Weight: 0.58
Siblings alabama
Weight: 0.36
, new mexico
Weight: 0.36
, dallas
Weight: 0.35
, north carolina
Weight: 0.35
, new orleans
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be called city 1.00
be as city 0.92
be port city on being water 0.81
be called crush city 0.79
be port city on being directly water 0.77
be called clutch city 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(houston, be called city)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(new orleans, be called city)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(houston, be called city)
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(new orleans, be called city)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(new orleans, be called city)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(houston, be called city)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(houston, be called city)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(houston, be called city)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(houston, be as city)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(houston, be called city)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(houston, be called crush city)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(houston, be called city)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(houston, be port city on being water)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(houston, be called city)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(houston, be as city)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(houston, be called city)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(houston, be port city on being directly water)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(houston, be called city)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(houston, be called crush city)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(houston, be called city)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(houston, be called clutch city)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(houston, be called city)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(houston, be as city)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(houston, be called city)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(houston, be as city)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(houston, be called city)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(houston, be port city on being water)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(houston, be called city)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(houston, be called crush city)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(houston, be called city)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(houston, be called clutch city)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(houston, be called city)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(houston, be called clutch city)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(houston, be called city)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(houston, be called clutch city)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(houston, be called city)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(houston, be port city on being directly water)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(houston, be called city)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(houston, be port city on being water)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(houston, be called city)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(houston, be port city on being directly water)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(houston, be called city)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(houston, be called crush city)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(houston, be called city)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(houston, be port city on being water)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(houston, be called city)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(houston, be port city on being directly water)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(houston, be called city)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(houston, be called city)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(houston, be called city)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(houston, be called city)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(houston, be called city)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(houston, be called city)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(new orleans, be called city)