houston: be divided into wards

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents texas
Weight: 0.67
, location
Weight: 0.59
, team
Weight: 0.58
, atlanta
Weight: 0.58
Siblings alabama
Weight: 0.36
, new mexico
Weight: 0.36
, dallas
Weight: 0.35
, north carolina
Weight: 0.35
, new orleans
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be divided into wards 1.00
have wards 0.92

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(houston, be divided into wards) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(new orleans, be divided into wards)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(houston, be divided into wards) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(new orleans, be divided into wards) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(new orleans, be divided into wards)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(houston, be divided into wards) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(houston, be divided into wards)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(houston, be divided into wards) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(houston, have wards)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(houston, be divided into wards) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(houston, have wards)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(houston, be divided into wards) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(houston, have wards)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(houston, be divided into wards) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(houston, have wards)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(houston, be divided into wards) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(houston, be divided into wards) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(houston, be divided into wards)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(houston, be divided into wards) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(houston, be divided into wards)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(houston, be divided into wards) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(new orleans, be divided into wards)