houston: be prone to major flooding

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents texas
Weight: 0.67
, location
Weight: 0.59
, team
Weight: 0.58
, atlanta
Weight: 0.58
Siblings alabama
Weight: 0.36
, new mexico
Weight: 0.36
, dallas
Weight: 0.35
, north carolina
Weight: 0.35
, new orleans
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be prone to major flooding 1.00
be prone to flooding 0.97
is flooding 0.87
keep flooding 0.85
be vulnerable to devastating floods 0.83
flood 0.80
is flooded 0.77
get flooded 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(houston, be prone to major flooding) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(dallas, flood)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(houston, be prone to major flooding) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(dallas, flood) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(dallas, flood)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(houston, be prone to major flooding) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(houston, be prone to major flooding)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(houston, be prone to major flooding) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(houston, is flooding)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(houston, be prone to major flooding) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(houston, is flooding)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(houston, be prone to major flooding) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(houston, be prone to flooding)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(houston, be prone to major flooding) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(houston, be prone to flooding)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(houston, be prone to major flooding) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(houston, is flooding)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(houston, be prone to major flooding) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(houston, be vulnerable to devastating floods)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(houston, be prone to major flooding) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(houston, be prone to flooding)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(houston, be prone to major flooding) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(houston, be vulnerable to devastating floods)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(houston, be prone to major flooding) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(houston, be vulnerable to devastating floods)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(houston, be prone to major flooding) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(houston, is flooding)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(houston, be prone to major flooding) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(houston, flood)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(houston, be prone to major flooding) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(houston, flood)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(houston, be prone to major flooding) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(houston, keep flooding)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(houston, be prone to major flooding) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(houston, be vulnerable to devastating floods)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(houston, be prone to major flooding) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(houston, is flooded)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(houston, be prone to major flooding) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(houston, keep flooding)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(houston, be prone to major flooding) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(houston, is flooded)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(houston, be prone to major flooding) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(houston, flood)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(houston, be prone to major flooding) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(houston, be prone to flooding)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(houston, be prone to major flooding) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(houston, flood)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(houston, be prone to major flooding) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(houston, keep flooding)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(houston, be prone to major flooding) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(houston, is flooded)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(houston, be prone to major flooding) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(houston, is flooded)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(houston, be prone to major flooding) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(houston, get flooded)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(houston, be prone to major flooding) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(houston, keep flooding)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(houston, be prone to major flooding) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(houston, get flooded)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(houston, be prone to major flooding) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(houston, get flooded)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(houston, be prone to major flooding) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(houston, get flooded)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(houston, be prone to major flooding) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(houston, be prone to major flooding) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(houston, be prone to major flooding)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(houston, be prone to major flooding) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(houston, be prone to major flooding)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(houston, be prone to major flooding) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(dallas, flood)