hull: have bad reputation

Related concepts

Parents	port Weight: 0.67 , ship Weight: 0.60 , material Weight: 0.57 , city Weight: 0.54
Siblings	cargo ship Weight: 0.37 , cruise ship Weight: 0.36 , barge Weight: 0.34 , sloop Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property	Similarity
have bad reputation	1.00
have reputation	0.97
has quality good	0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.90

Plausible(city, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Typical(hull, have bad reputation)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.02

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.17

Plausible(hull, have bad reputation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Plausible(city, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Remarkable(hull, have bad reputation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Remarkable(city, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.90

Plausible(city, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

Remarkable(hull, have bad reputation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.17

¬ Plausible(hull, have bad reputation)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.17

Plausible(hull, have bad reputation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.17

¬ Salient(hull, have bad reputation)

Similarity expansion

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.43

Typical(hull, have bad reputation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Typical(hull, have reputation)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.17

Plausible(hull, have bad reputation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Plausible(hull, have reputation)

0.38

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.43

Typical(hull, have bad reputation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Typical(hull, has quality good)

0.29

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.17

Salient(hull, have bad reputation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Salient(hull, have reputation)

0.27

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.16

Remarkable(hull, have bad reputation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Remarkable(hull, have reputation)

0.26

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.16

Remarkable(hull, have bad reputation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(hull, has quality good)

0.25

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.17

Plausible(hull, have bad reputation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Plausible(hull, has quality good)

0.18

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.17

Salient(hull, have bad reputation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Salient(hull, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.17

Salient(hull, have bad reputation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Typical(hull, have bad reputation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Remarkable(hull, have bad reputation)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.17

Plausible(hull, have bad reputation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Typical(hull, have bad reputation)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Remarkable(hull, have bad reputation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Typical(city, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.18

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.43

Typical(hull, have bad reputation) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Typical(city, has quality good)