human brain: have thc receptors

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents neural network
Weight: 0.72
, tissue
Weight: 0.69
, human body
Weight: 0.68
, organ
Weight: 0.67
Siblings cerebral cortex
Weight: 0.76
, frontal lobe
Weight: 0.60
, human cell
Weight: 0.38
, blood brain barrier
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
have thc receptors 1.00
be receptors classified 0.95
has physical part receptors 0.95
have cannabinoid receptors 0.93
have nicotine receptors 0.92
be sensory receptors 0.92
be sensory receptors classified 0.91
have more genes than bacterial cells 0.83
producing serotonin 0.79
produce dopamine 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.62
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(human body, have cannabinoid receptors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(human brain, have thc receptors)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(human body, have nicotine receptors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(human brain, have thc receptors)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(human brain, have thc receptors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(human body, have cannabinoid receptors)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(human brain, have thc receptors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(human body, have nicotine receptors)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(human brain, have thc receptors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(human body, have cannabinoid receptors)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(human brain, have thc receptors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(human body, have nicotine receptors)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(human brain, have thc receptors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(human cell, have more genes than bacterial cells)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(human body, have cannabinoid receptors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(human brain, have thc receptors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(human brain, have thc receptors)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(human body, have nicotine receptors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(human brain, have thc receptors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(human brain, have thc receptors)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(human brain, have thc receptors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(human cell, have more genes than bacterial cells) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(human cell, have more genes than bacterial cells)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(human brain, have thc receptors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(human brain, have thc receptors)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(human brain, have thc receptors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(human brain, have cannabinoid receptors)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(human brain, have thc receptors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(human brain, have cannabinoid receptors)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(human brain, have thc receptors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(human brain, have cannabinoid receptors)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.01
Typical(human brain, have thc receptors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(human brain, have cannabinoid receptors)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(human brain, have thc receptors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(human brain, have thc receptors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(human brain, have thc receptors)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(human brain, have thc receptors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(human brain, have thc receptors)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(human brain, have thc receptors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(human body, have cannabinoid receptors)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(human brain, have thc receptors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(human body, have nicotine receptors)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(human brain, have thc receptors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(human cell, have more genes than bacterial cells)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.17
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.01
Typical(human brain, have thc receptors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(human body, have cannabinoid receptors)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.01
Typical(human brain, have thc receptors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(human body, have nicotine receptors)