human skull: have crack lines in them

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents bone
Weight: 0.63
, object
Weight: 0.59
, item
Weight: 0.59
, relic
Weight: 0.57
, ape
Weight: 0.45
Siblings skull
Weight: 0.38
, pelvis
Weight: 0.35
, human skeleton
Weight: 0.35
, human hand
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
have crack lines in them 1.00
have cracks in them 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(human skull, have crack lines in them) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(skull, have crack lines in them)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(human skull, have crack lines in them) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(skull, have cracks in them)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(human skull, have crack lines in them) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(skull, have crack lines in them) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(skull, have crack lines in them)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(human skull, have crack lines in them) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(skull, have cracks in them) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(skull, have cracks in them)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(human skull, have crack lines in them) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(human skull, have crack lines in them)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(human skull, have crack lines in them) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(human skull, have cracks in them)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(human skull, have crack lines in them) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(human skull, have cracks in them)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(human skull, have crack lines in them) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(human skull, have cracks in them)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(human skull, have crack lines in them) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(human skull, have cracks in them)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(human skull, have crack lines in them) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(human skull, have crack lines in them) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(human skull, have crack lines in them)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(human skull, have crack lines in them) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(human skull, have crack lines in them)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(human skull, have crack lines in them) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(skull, have crack lines in them)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(human skull, have crack lines in them) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(skull, have cracks in them)