human waste: be worse than animal waste

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents waste
Weight: 0.74
, garbage
Weight: 0.66
, refuse
Weight: 0.64
, debris
Weight: 0.63
, river
Weight: 0.61
Siblings garbage can
Weight: 0.35
, trash can
Weight: 0.34
, compost
Weight: 0.34
, residue
Weight: 0.32
, slag
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be worse than animal waste 1.00
affect animals 0.77
be important to animals 0.77
smell like garbage 0.76
buried in landfill cause pollution water supply 0.76
is garbage 0.76
buried in landfill cause pollution 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(waste, be worse than animal waste)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(human waste, be worse than animal waste)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(garbage, buried in landfill cause pollution)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(human waste, be worse than animal waste)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(garbage, buried in landfill cause pollution water supply)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(human waste, be worse than animal waste)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(refuse, is garbage)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(human waste, be worse than animal waste)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(garbage, smell like garbage)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(human waste, be worse than animal waste)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(garbage, affect animals)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(human waste, be worse than animal waste)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(human waste, be worse than animal waste)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(garbage, affect animals)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(human waste, be worse than animal waste)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(waste, be worse than animal waste)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(human waste, be worse than animal waste)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(garbage, smell like garbage)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(human waste, be worse than animal waste)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(refuse, is garbage)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(human waste, be worse than animal waste)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(garbage, buried in landfill cause pollution water supply)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(human waste, be worse than animal waste)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(garbage, buried in landfill cause pollution)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(human waste, be worse than animal waste)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(garbage, affect animals)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(human waste, be worse than animal waste)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(waste, be worse than animal waste)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(human waste, be worse than animal waste)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(garbage, buried in landfill cause pollution water supply)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(human waste, be worse than animal waste)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(refuse, is garbage)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(human waste, be worse than animal waste)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(garbage, buried in landfill cause pollution)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(human waste, be worse than animal waste)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(garbage, smell like garbage)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(waste, be worse than animal waste)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(human waste, be worse than animal waste)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(human waste, be worse than animal waste)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(garbage, buried in landfill cause pollution water supply)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(human waste, be worse than animal waste)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(human waste, be worse than animal waste)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(garbage, buried in landfill cause pollution)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(human waste, be worse than animal waste)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(human waste, be worse than animal waste)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(refuse, is garbage)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(human waste, be worse than animal waste)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(human waste, be worse than animal waste)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(garbage, smell like garbage)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(human waste, be worse than animal waste)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(human waste, be worse than animal waste)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(garbage, affect animals)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(human waste, be worse than animal waste)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(human waste, be worse than animal waste)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(human waste, be worse than animal waste)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(human waste, be worse than animal waste)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(human waste, be worse than animal waste)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(human waste, be worse than animal waste)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(human waste, be worse than animal waste)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(human waste, be worse than animal waste)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(human waste, be worse than animal waste)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(human waste, be worse than animal waste)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(garbage, affect animals)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(human waste, be worse than animal waste)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(refuse, is garbage)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(human waste, be worse than animal waste)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(garbage, smell like garbage)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(human waste, be worse than animal waste)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(waste, be worse than animal waste)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(human waste, be worse than animal waste)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(garbage, buried in landfill cause pollution water supply)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(human waste, be worse than animal waste)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(garbage, buried in landfill cause pollution)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(human waste, be worse than animal waste)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(garbage, affect animals)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(human waste, be worse than animal waste)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(refuse, is garbage)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(human waste, be worse than animal waste)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(waste, be worse than animal waste)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(human waste, be worse than animal waste)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(garbage, smell like garbage)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(human waste, be worse than animal waste)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(garbage, buried in landfill cause pollution water supply)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(human waste, be worse than animal waste)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(garbage, buried in landfill cause pollution)