human: destroy nature

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents monster
Weight: 0.64
, animal
Weight: 0.64
, person
Weight: 0.62
, form
Weight: 0.62
, living thing
Weight: 0.61
Siblings human being
Weight: 0.38
, wild animal
Weight: 0.35
, creature
Weight: 0.34
, one person
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
destroy nature 1.00
use nature 0.85
is nature 0.84
interfere with nature 0.83
find nature 0.83
were important to nature 0.80
perceive nature 0.80
find beauty in nature 0.79
perceive beauty in nature 0.79
be useful to nature 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(human, destroy nature) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Salient(human, destroy nature)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(human, destroy nature) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(human, use nature)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(human, destroy nature) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(human, use nature)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 1.00
Salient(human, destroy nature) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Salient(human, use nature)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 1.00
Typical(human, destroy nature) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(human, use nature)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(human, destroy nature) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(human, interfere with nature)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(human, destroy nature) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(human, interfere with nature)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 1.00
Salient(human, destroy nature) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Salient(human, interfere with nature)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 1.00
Typical(human, destroy nature) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(human, interfere with nature)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(human, destroy nature) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(human, were important to nature)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(human, destroy nature) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(human, were important to nature)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 1.00
Salient(human, destroy nature) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Salient(human, were important to nature)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 1.00
Typical(human, destroy nature) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(human, were important to nature)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Salient(human, destroy nature) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(human, destroy nature) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(human, destroy nature)

Typical implies Plausible

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(human, destroy nature) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(human, destroy nature)