human: have two eyes

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents monster
Weight: 0.64
, animal
Weight: 0.64
, person
Weight: 0.62
, form
Weight: 0.62
, living thing
Weight: 0.61
Siblings human being
Weight: 0.38
, wild animal
Weight: 0.35
, creature
Weight: 0.34
, one person
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
have two eyes 1.00
survive without eyes 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(human, have two eyes)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(human being, have two eyes)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(human, have two eyes)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(creature, have two eyes)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(human, have two eyes)
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(human being, have two eyes)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(human being, have two eyes)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(human, have two eyes)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(creature, have two eyes)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(creature, have two eyes)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(human, have two eyes)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Salient(human, have two eyes)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(human, have two eyes)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(human, survive without eyes)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 1.00
Salient(human, have two eyes)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Salient(human, survive without eyes)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(human, have two eyes)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(human, survive without eyes)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 1.00
Typical(human, have two eyes)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(human, survive without eyes)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Salient(human, have two eyes)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(human, have two eyes)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(human, have two eyes)

Typical implies Plausible

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(human, have two eyes)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(human, have two eyes)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(human, have two eyes)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(human being, have two eyes)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(human, have two eyes)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(creature, have two eyes)