hummer: be bad on gas

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents vehicle
Weight: 0.64
, thing
Weight: 0.54
, car
Weight: 0.52
, brand
Weight: 0.50
, truck
Weight: 0.48
Siblings pickup truck
Weight: 0.35
, motor vehicle
Weight: 0.35
, jeep
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad on gas 1.00
use gas 0.89
get bad gas mileage 0.86
get gas mileage 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(truck, use gas)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(hummer, be bad on gas)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(truck, get gas mileage)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(hummer, be bad on gas)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(car, use gas)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(hummer, be bad on gas)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(hummer, be bad on gas)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(car, use gas)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(hummer, be bad on gas)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(truck, use gas)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(hummer, be bad on gas)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(truck, get gas mileage)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.49
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(hummer, be bad on gas)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(car, use gas)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(hummer, be bad on gas)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(truck, use gas)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(hummer, be bad on gas)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(truck, get gas mileage)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(hummer, be bad on gas)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(jeep, be bad on gas)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(hummer, be bad on gas)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(jeep, use gas)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(hummer, be bad on gas)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(pickup truck, get bad gas mileage)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(hummer, be bad on gas)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(jeep, get bad gas mileage)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(hummer, be bad on gas)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(pickup truck, get gas mileage)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(truck, use gas)
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(hummer, be bad on gas)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(hummer, be bad on gas)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(car, use gas)
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(hummer, be bad on gas)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(hummer, be bad on gas)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(truck, get gas mileage)
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(hummer, be bad on gas)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(hummer, be bad on gas)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(hummer, be bad on gas)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(jeep, get bad gas mileage)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(jeep, get bad gas mileage)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(hummer, be bad on gas)
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(jeep, use gas)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(jeep, use gas)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(hummer, be bad on gas)
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(jeep, be bad on gas)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(jeep, be bad on gas)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(hummer, be bad on gas)
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(pickup truck, get bad gas mileage)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(pickup truck, get bad gas mileage)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(hummer, be bad on gas)
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(pickup truck, get gas mileage)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(pickup truck, get gas mileage)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(hummer, be bad on gas)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(hummer, be bad on gas)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(hummer, be bad on gas)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(hummer, use gas)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(hummer, be bad on gas)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(hummer, use gas)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(hummer, be bad on gas)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(hummer, use gas)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(hummer, be bad on gas)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(hummer, get bad gas mileage)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(hummer, be bad on gas)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(hummer, get bad gas mileage)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(hummer, be bad on gas)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(hummer, get bad gas mileage)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(hummer, be bad on gas)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(hummer, use gas)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(hummer, be bad on gas)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(hummer, get gas mileage)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(hummer, be bad on gas)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(hummer, get gas mileage)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(hummer, be bad on gas)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(hummer, get gas mileage)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(hummer, be bad on gas)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(hummer, get bad gas mileage)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(hummer, be bad on gas)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(hummer, get gas mileage)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(hummer, be bad on gas)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(hummer, be bad on gas)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(hummer, be bad on gas)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(hummer, be bad on gas)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(hummer, be bad on gas)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(hummer, be bad on gas)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(truck, use gas)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(hummer, be bad on gas)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(car, use gas)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(hummer, be bad on gas)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(truck, get gas mileage)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(hummer, be bad on gas)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(jeep, be bad on gas)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(hummer, be bad on gas)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(jeep, use gas)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(hummer, be bad on gas)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(pickup truck, get bad gas mileage)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(hummer, be bad on gas)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(jeep, get bad gas mileage)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(hummer, be bad on gas)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(pickup truck, get gas mileage)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(hummer, be bad on gas)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(truck, use gas)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(hummer, be bad on gas)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(car, use gas)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(hummer, be bad on gas)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(truck, get gas mileage)