humor: be like food

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents characteristic
Weight: 0.63
, topic
Weight: 0.60
, quality
Weight: 0.59
, tool
Weight: 0.58
, element
Weight: 0.57
Siblings honesty
Weight: 0.35
, warmth
Weight: 0.34
, character
Weight: 0.34
, wit
Weight: 0.34
, intellect
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be like food 1.00
be like just food 0.96
be like chocolate 0.77
be like just schrodinger 's cat 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(humor, be like food)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(humor, be like food)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(humor, be like food)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(humor, be like just food)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(humor, be like food)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(humor, be like just food)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(humor, be like food)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(humor, be like just food)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(humor, be like food)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(humor, be like just schrodinger 's cat)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(humor, be like food)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(humor, be like just schrodinger 's cat)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(humor, be like food)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(humor, be like just schrodinger 's cat)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(humor, be like food)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(humor, be like just food)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(humor, be like food)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(humor, be like just schrodinger 's cat)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(humor, be like food)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(humor, be like chocolate)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(humor, be like food)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(humor, be like chocolate)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(humor, be like food)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(humor, be like chocolate)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(humor, be like food)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(humor, be like chocolate)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(humor, be like food)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(humor, be like food)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(humor, be like food)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(humor, be like food)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(humor, be like food)