humpback whale: be important to food chain

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents whale
Weight: 0.90
, mammal
Weight: 0.75
, endangered species
Weight: 0.75
, animal
Weight: 0.74
, species
Weight: 0.73
Siblings whale shark
Weight: 0.45
, blue whale
Weight: 0.45
, sperm whale
Weight: 0.43
, pilot whale
Weight: 0.43

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important to food chain 1.00
get food 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(humpback whale, be important to food chain)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(blue whale, get food)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(humpback whale, be important to food chain)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(blue whale, get food)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(blue whale, get food)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(humpback whale, be important to food chain)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(humpback whale, be important to food chain)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(humpback whale, be important to food chain)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(humpback whale, get food)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(humpback whale, be important to food chain)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(humpback whale, get food)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(humpback whale, be important to food chain)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(humpback whale, get food)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(humpback whale, be important to food chain)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(humpback whale, get food)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(humpback whale, be important to food chain)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(humpback whale, be important to food chain)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(humpback whale, be important to food chain)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(humpback whale, be important to food chain)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(humpback whale, be important to food chain)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(humpback whale, be important to food chain)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(blue whale, get food)