hungry: need food

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents favorite
Weight: 0.53
, thing
Weight: 0.38
, hit
Weight: 0.36
, everything
Weight: 0.35
, excuse
Weight: 0.35
Siblings hot dog
Weight: 0.31
, pasta
Weight: 0.30
, star trek
Weight: 0.30
, lasagna
Weight: 0.29
, bad food
Weight: 0.29

Related properties

Property Similarity
need food 1.00
wants to have food 0.92
be used to eat 0.77
be eat 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.66
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(thing, need food)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(hungry, need food)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(hungry, need food)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(thing, need food)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(hungry, need food)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(thing, need food)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(hungry, need food)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(lasagna, be eat)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(hungry, need food)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(lasagna, be used to eat)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(hungry, need food)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(hot dog, be used to eat)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(thing, need food)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(hungry, need food)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(hungry, need food)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(hungry, need food)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(hot dog, be used to eat)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(hot dog, be used to eat)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(hungry, need food)
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(lasagna, be used to eat)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(lasagna, be used to eat)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(hungry, need food)
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(lasagna, be eat)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(lasagna, be eat)

Salient implies Plausible

0.15
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(hungry, need food)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(hungry, need food)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(hungry, need food)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(hungry, wants to have food)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(hungry, need food)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(hungry, wants to have food)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(hungry, need food)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(hungry, wants to have food)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(hungry, need food)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(hungry, wants to have food)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(hungry, need food)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(hungry, need food)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(hungry, need food)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(hungry, need food)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(hungry, need food)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(hungry, need food)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(thing, need food)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(hungry, need food)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(hot dog, be used to eat)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(hungry, need food)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(lasagna, be used to eat)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(hungry, need food)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(lasagna, be eat)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.12
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(hungry, need food)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(thing, need food)