hunter: bone chicken

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents man
Weight: 0.66
, warrior
Weight: 0.64
, artist
Weight: 0.60
, author
Weight: 0.60
, class
Weight: 0.60
Siblings young man
Weight: 0.35
, fisherman
Weight: 0.35
, fisher
Weight: 0.34
, old man
Weight: 0.34
, fox
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
bone chicken 1.00
bone fish 0.90
kill chicken 0.82
bone salmon 0.82
be at chicken coop 0.77
cook steak on grill 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(hunter, bone chicken)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(fisherman, bone fish)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(hunter, bone chicken)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(fox, kill chicken)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(hunter, bone chicken)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(fox, be at chicken coop)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(hunter, bone chicken)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(fisherman, bone salmon)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(hunter, bone chicken)
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(fisherman, bone fish)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(fisherman, bone fish)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(hunter, bone chicken)
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(fisherman, bone salmon)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(fisherman, bone salmon)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(hunter, bone chicken)
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(fox, kill chicken)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(fox, kill chicken)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(hunter, bone chicken)
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(fox, be at chicken coop)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(fox, be at chicken coop)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(hunter, bone chicken)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(hunter, bone chicken)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(hunter, bone chicken)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(hunter, bone chicken)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(hunter, bone chicken)

Typical implies Plausible

0.11
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(hunter, bone chicken)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(hunter, bone chicken)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(hunter, bone chicken)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(fisherman, bone fish)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(hunter, bone chicken)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(fisherman, bone salmon)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(hunter, bone chicken)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(fox, kill chicken)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(hunter, bone chicken)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(fox, be at chicken coop)