hunter: spring trap

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents man
Weight: 0.66
, warrior
Weight: 0.64
, artist
Weight: 0.60
, author
Weight: 0.60
, class
Weight: 0.60
Siblings young man
Weight: 0.35
, fisherman
Weight: 0.35
, fisher
Weight: 0.34
, old man
Weight: 0.34
, fox
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
spring trap 1.00
be at trap 0.92
cover trap 0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(hunter, spring trap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(fox, be at trap)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(hunter, spring trap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(fox, be at trap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(fox, be at trap)

Salient implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(hunter, spring trap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(hunter, spring trap)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(hunter, spring trap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(hunter, cover trap)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(hunter, spring trap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(hunter, cover trap)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(hunter, spring trap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(hunter, cover trap)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(hunter, spring trap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(hunter, cover trap)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(hunter, spring trap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(hunter, spring trap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(hunter, spring trap)

Typical implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(hunter, spring trap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(hunter, spring trap)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(hunter, spring trap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(fox, be at trap)