hunting: be to wise use

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents pursuit
Weight: 0.64
, sport
Weight: 0.61
, practice
Weight: 0.60
, activity
Weight: 0.60
, hobby
Weight: 0.57
Siblings archery
Weight: 0.36
, fishing
Weight: 0.34
, canoeing
Weight: 0.33
, camping
Weight: 0.33
, business activity
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be to wise use 1.00
be to wise use of life resources 0.89
be to wise use of wild life resources 0.85
be to wise use of renewable life resources 0.81
be to wise use of renewable wild life resources 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(hunting, be to wise use)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(hunting, be to wise use)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(hunting, be to wise use)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(hunting, be to wise use of life resources)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(hunting, be to wise use)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(hunting, be to wise use of life resources)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(hunting, be to wise use)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(hunting, be to wise use of renewable life resources)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(hunting, be to wise use)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(hunting, be to wise use of renewable wild life resources)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(hunting, be to wise use)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(hunting, be to wise use of wild life resources)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(hunting, be to wise use)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(hunting, be to wise use of life resources)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(hunting, be to wise use)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(hunting, be to wise use of life resources)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(hunting, be to wise use)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(hunting, be to wise use of wild life resources)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(hunting, be to wise use)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(hunting, be to wise use of wild life resources)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(hunting, be to wise use)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(hunting, be to wise use of renewable life resources)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(hunting, be to wise use)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(hunting, be to wise use of renewable life resources)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(hunting, be to wise use)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(hunting, be to wise use of renewable life resources)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(hunting, be to wise use)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(hunting, be to wise use of wild life resources)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(hunting, be to wise use)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(hunting, be to wise use of renewable wild life resources)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(hunting, be to wise use)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(hunting, be to wise use of renewable wild life resources)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(hunting, be to wise use)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(hunting, be to wise use of renewable wild life resources)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(hunting, be to wise use)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(hunting, be to wise use)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(hunting, be to wise use)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(hunting, be to wise use)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(hunting, be to wise use)