husband: be used to partner to wife

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents father
Weight: 0.70
, lover
Weight: 0.66
, neighbor
Weight: 0.66
, old man
Weight: 0.66
, family member
Weight: 0.65
Siblings boyfriend
Weight: 0.64
, son
Weight: 0.39
, mother
Weight: 0.39
, wife
Weight: 0.38
, grandfather
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be used to partner to wife 1.00
be used to wife 0.91
has wife 0.90
be defined as wife of father 0.87
be used to husband 0.86
marry wife 0.85
be marry to wife 0.85
be used to wife to sleep with 0.84
long for his wife 0.84
be at love with his wife 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(husband, be used to partner to wife)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(mother, be defined as wife of father)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(husband, be used to partner to wife)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(wife, be used to husband)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(husband, be used to partner to wife)
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(wife, be used to husband)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(wife, be used to husband)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(husband, be used to partner to wife)
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(mother, be defined as wife of father)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(mother, be defined as wife of father)

Salient implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(husband, be used to partner to wife)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(husband, be used to partner to wife)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(husband, be used to partner to wife)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(husband, be used to wife)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(husband, be used to partner to wife)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(husband, be used to wife)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(husband, be used to partner to wife)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(husband, has wife)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(husband, be used to partner to wife)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(husband, has wife)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(husband, be used to partner to wife)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(husband, has wife)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(husband, be used to partner to wife)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(husband, be used to partner to wife)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(husband, be used to partner to wife)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(husband, be used to partner to wife)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(husband, be used to partner to wife)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(husband, be used to partner to wife)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(wife, be used to husband)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(husband, be used to partner to wife)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(mother, be defined as wife of father)