husky: be at connecticut

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dog
Weight: 0.56
, animal
Weight: 0.47
, wolf
Weight: 0.46
, brand
Weight: 0.43
, vehicle
Weight: 0.36
Siblings cocker spaniel
Weight: 0.35
, beagle
Weight: 0.35
, labrador retriever
Weight: 0.35
, small dog
Weight: 0.35
, rottweiler
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at connecticut 1.00
be at illinois 0.81
be at florida 0.81
be at oklahoma 0.81
be at utah 0.80
be at georgia 0.79
be at mexico 0.78
be at new hampshire 0.78
be at maine 0.77
be at london 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(husky, be at connecticut)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(small dog, be at london)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(husky, be at connecticut)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(small dog, be at new hampshire)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(husky, be at connecticut)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(small dog, be at georgia)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(husky, be at connecticut)
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(small dog, be at new hampshire)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(small dog, be at new hampshire)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(husky, be at connecticut)
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(small dog, be at georgia)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(small dog, be at georgia)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(husky, be at connecticut)
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(small dog, be at london)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(small dog, be at london)

Salient implies Plausible

0.10
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(husky, be at connecticut)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(husky, be at connecticut)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(husky, be at connecticut)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(husky, be at connecticut)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(husky, be at connecticut)

Typical implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(husky, be at connecticut)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(husky, be at connecticut)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(husky, be at connecticut)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(small dog, be at georgia)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(husky, be at connecticut)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(small dog, be at london)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(husky, be at connecticut)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(small dog, be at new hampshire)