hydrangea: has physical part zones

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents flower
Weight: 0.76
, plant
Weight: 0.61
, vine
Weight: 0.57
, thing
Weight: 0.51
Siblings hibiscus
Weight: 0.39
, chrysanthemum
Weight: 0.39
, lily
Weight: 0.38
, hyacinth
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part zones 1.00
has physical part zone 0.93
zone 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(hydrangea, has physical part zones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(hibiscus, has physical part zone)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(hydrangea, has physical part zones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(hibiscus, has physical part zone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(hibiscus, has physical part zone)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(hydrangea, has physical part zones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(hydrangea, has physical part zones)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(hydrangea, has physical part zones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(hydrangea, has physical part zone)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(hydrangea, has physical part zones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(hydrangea, has physical part zone)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(hydrangea, has physical part zones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(hydrangea, has physical part zone)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(hydrangea, has physical part zones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(hydrangea, zone)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(hydrangea, has physical part zones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(hydrangea, zone)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(hydrangea, has physical part zones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(hydrangea, has physical part zone)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(hydrangea, has physical part zones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(hydrangea, zone)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(hydrangea, has physical part zones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(hydrangea, zone)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(hydrangea, has physical part zones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(hydrangea, has physical part zones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(hydrangea, has physical part zones)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(hydrangea, has physical part zones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(hydrangea, has physical part zones)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(hydrangea, has physical part zones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(hibiscus, has physical part zone)