hydrocarbon: be bad for humans

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents carbon dioxide
Weight: 0.61
, carbon monoxide
Weight: 0.59
, source
Weight: 0.58
, chemical
Weight: 0.58
Siblings vegetable oil
Weight: 0.71
, hydrogen sulfide
Weight: 0.70
, ethane
Weight: 0.70
, ethylene
Weight: 0.69
, carbon tetrachloride
Weight: 0.69

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad for humans 1.00
be bad for environment 0.78
affect animals 0.76
be better than animal fat 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.63
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(carbon dioxide, be bad for humans)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(hydrocarbon, be bad for humans)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(carbon dioxide, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(hydrocarbon, be bad for humans)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(carbon monoxide, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(hydrocarbon, be bad for humans)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(hydrocarbon, be bad for humans)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(carbon monoxide, be bad for environment)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(hydrocarbon, be bad for humans)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(carbon dioxide, be bad for humans)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(hydrocarbon, be bad for humans)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(carbon dioxide, be bad for environment)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.57
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(hydrocarbon, be bad for humans)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(carbon dioxide, be bad for humans)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(hydrocarbon, be bad for humans)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(carbon monoxide, be bad for environment)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(hydrocarbon, be bad for humans)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(carbon dioxide, be bad for environment)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(hydrocarbon, be bad for humans)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(vegetable oil, be better than animal fat)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(carbon dioxide, be bad for humans)
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(hydrocarbon, be bad for humans)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(hydrocarbon, be bad for humans)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(carbon dioxide, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(hydrocarbon, be bad for humans)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(hydrocarbon, be bad for humans)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(carbon monoxide, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(hydrocarbon, be bad for humans)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(hydrocarbon, be bad for humans)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(hydrocarbon, be bad for humans)
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(vegetable oil, be better than animal fat)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(vegetable oil, be better than animal fat)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(hydrocarbon, be bad for humans)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(hydrocarbon, be bad for humans)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(hydrocarbon, be bad for humans)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(hydrocarbon, be bad for environment)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(hydrocarbon, be bad for humans)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(hydrocarbon, be bad for environment)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(hydrocarbon, be bad for humans)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(hydrocarbon, be bad for environment)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(hydrocarbon, be bad for humans)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(hydrocarbon, be bad for environment)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(hydrocarbon, be bad for humans)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(hydrocarbon, be bad for humans)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(hydrocarbon, be bad for humans)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(hydrocarbon, be bad for humans)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(hydrocarbon, be bad for humans)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.50
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(hydrocarbon, be bad for humans)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(carbon dioxide, be bad for humans)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(hydrocarbon, be bad for humans)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(carbon monoxide, be bad for environment)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(hydrocarbon, be bad for humans)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(carbon dioxide, be bad for environment)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(hydrocarbon, be bad for humans)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(vegetable oil, be better than animal fat)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(hydrocarbon, be bad for humans)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(carbon monoxide, be bad for environment)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(hydrocarbon, be bad for humans)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(carbon dioxide, be bad for humans)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(hydrocarbon, be bad for humans)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(carbon dioxide, be bad for environment)