hydrolysis: be energetically favored instead of condensation

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents chemical reaction
Weight: 0.65
, process
Weight: 0.64
, reaction
Weight: 0.58
, factor
Weight: 0.55
, problem
Weight: 0.49
Siblings fermentation
Weight: 0.36
, oxidation
Weight: 0.36
, phagocytosis
Weight: 0.35
, oxidative phosphorylation
Weight: 0.35
, digestion
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be energetically favored instead of condensation 1.00
be reverse of condensation 0.83
compare to condensation 0.81
is energetically favorable 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(hydrolysis, be energetically favored instead of condensation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(oxidation, is energetically favorable)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(hydrolysis, be energetically favored instead of condensation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(oxidation, is energetically favorable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(oxidation, is energetically favorable)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(hydrolysis, be energetically favored instead of condensation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(hydrolysis, be energetically favored instead of condensation)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(hydrolysis, be energetically favored instead of condensation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(hydrolysis, is energetically favorable)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(hydrolysis, be energetically favored instead of condensation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(hydrolysis, is energetically favorable)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(hydrolysis, be energetically favored instead of condensation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(hydrolysis, is energetically favorable)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(hydrolysis, be energetically favored instead of condensation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(hydrolysis, be reverse of condensation)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(hydrolysis, be energetically favored instead of condensation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(hydrolysis, is energetically favorable)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(hydrolysis, be energetically favored instead of condensation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(hydrolysis, be reverse of condensation)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(hydrolysis, be energetically favored instead of condensation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(hydrolysis, compare to condensation)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(hydrolysis, be energetically favored instead of condensation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(hydrolysis, be reverse of condensation)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(hydrolysis, be energetically favored instead of condensation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(hydrolysis, be reverse of condensation)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(hydrolysis, be energetically favored instead of condensation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(hydrolysis, compare to condensation)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(hydrolysis, be energetically favored instead of condensation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(hydrolysis, compare to condensation)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(hydrolysis, be energetically favored instead of condensation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(hydrolysis, compare to condensation)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(hydrolysis, be energetically favored instead of condensation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(hydrolysis, be energetically favored instead of condensation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(hydrolysis, be energetically favored instead of condensation)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(hydrolysis, be energetically favored instead of condensation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(hydrolysis, be energetically favored instead of condensation)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(hydrolysis, be energetically favored instead of condensation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(oxidation, is energetically favorable)