hysterectomy: is major operation

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents surgical procedure
Weight: 0.76
, surgery
Weight: 0.76
, operation
Weight: 0.61
, option
Weight: 0.55
, treatment
Weight: 0.55
Siblings mastectomy
Weight: 0.41
, plastic surgery
Weight: 0.40
, tonsillectomy
Weight: 0.39
, vasectomy
Weight: 0.38
, prostatectomy
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
is major operation 1.00
has state operation 0.91
is major 0.83
is pronounced operation 0.82
is major surgery 0.79
be considered major surgery 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(operation, has state operation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(hysterectomy, is major operation)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(operation, is pronounced operation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(hysterectomy, is major operation)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(hysterectomy, is major operation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(operation, is pronounced operation)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(hysterectomy, is major operation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(operation, has state operation)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(hysterectomy, is major operation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(operation, has state operation)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(hysterectomy, is major operation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(operation, is pronounced operation)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(hysterectomy, is major operation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(mastectomy, is major)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(hysterectomy, is major operation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(vasectomy, has state operation)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(hysterectomy, is major operation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(mastectomy, is major surgery)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(operation, has state operation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(hysterectomy, is major operation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(hysterectomy, is major operation)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(operation, is pronounced operation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(hysterectomy, is major operation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(hysterectomy, is major operation)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(hysterectomy, is major operation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(vasectomy, has state operation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(vasectomy, has state operation)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(hysterectomy, is major operation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(mastectomy, is major) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(mastectomy, is major)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(hysterectomy, is major operation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(mastectomy, is major surgery) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(mastectomy, is major surgery)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(hysterectomy, is major operation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(hysterectomy, is major operation)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(hysterectomy, is major operation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(hysterectomy, has state operation)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(hysterectomy, is major operation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(hysterectomy, has state operation)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(hysterectomy, is major operation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(hysterectomy, has state operation)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(hysterectomy, is major operation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(hysterectomy, has state operation)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(hysterectomy, is major operation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(hysterectomy, be considered major surgery)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(hysterectomy, is major operation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(hysterectomy, is major operation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(hysterectomy, is major operation)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(hysterectomy, is major operation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(hysterectomy, is major operation)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(hysterectomy, is major operation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(operation, is pronounced operation)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(hysterectomy, is major operation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(operation, has state operation)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(hysterectomy, is major operation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(vasectomy, has state operation)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(hysterectomy, is major operation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(mastectomy, is major)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(hysterectomy, is major operation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(mastectomy, is major surgery)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(hysterectomy, is major operation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(operation, is pronounced operation)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(hysterectomy, is major operation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(operation, has state operation)