ice cream: be at grocery store

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dish
Weight: 0.71
, ice cube
Weight: 0.70
, snack
Weight: 0.68
, ice
Weight: 0.58
Siblings cream cheese
Weight: 0.73
, cottage cheese
Weight: 0.67
, chocolate
Weight: 0.64
, hot coffee
Weight: 0.64
, pudding
Weight: 0.62

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at grocery store 1.00
be at supermarket 0.91
be at candy store 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.26
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(ice, be at grocery store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(ice cream, be at grocery store)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(ice, be at supermarket) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(ice cream, be at grocery store)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(snack, be at supermarket) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(ice cream, be at grocery store)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(ice cream, be at grocery store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(ice, be at grocery store)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(ice cream, be at grocery store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(snack, be at supermarket)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(ice cream, be at grocery store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(ice, be at supermarket)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.54
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(ice cream, be at grocery store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(ice, be at grocery store)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(ice cream, be at grocery store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(ice, be at supermarket)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(ice cream, be at grocery store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(snack, be at supermarket)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(ice cream, be at grocery store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(chocolate, be at candy store)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(ice, be at grocery store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(ice cream, be at grocery store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(ice cream, be at grocery store)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(ice, be at supermarket) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(ice cream, be at grocery store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(ice cream, be at grocery store)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(snack, be at supermarket) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(ice cream, be at grocery store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(ice cream, be at grocery store)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(ice cream, be at grocery store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(chocolate, be at candy store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(chocolate, be at candy store)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(ice cream, be at grocery store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(ice cream, be at grocery store)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(ice cream, be at grocery store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(ice cream, be at grocery store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(ice cream, be at grocery store)

Typical implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(ice cream, be at grocery store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(ice cream, be at grocery store)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(ice cream, be at grocery store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(ice, be at grocery store)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(ice cream, be at grocery store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(snack, be at supermarket)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(ice cream, be at grocery store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(ice, be at supermarket)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(ice cream, be at grocery store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(chocolate, be at candy store)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(ice cream, be at grocery store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(ice, be at grocery store)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(ice cream, be at grocery store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(snack, be at supermarket)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(ice cream, be at grocery store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(ice, be at supermarket)