ice cream: be bad for dogs

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dish
Weight: 0.71
, ice cube
Weight: 0.70
, frozen custard
Weight: 0.59
, ice
Weight: 0.58
Siblings cream cheese
Weight: 0.73
, cottage cheese
Weight: 0.67
, chocolate
Weight: 0.64
, hot coffee
Weight: 0.64
, pudding
Weight: 0.62

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad for dogs 1.00
be good for dogs 0.97

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(ice cube, be bad for dogs)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(ice cream, be bad for dogs)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(ice cube, be good for dogs)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(ice cream, be bad for dogs)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(ice cream, be bad for dogs)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(ice cube, be bad for dogs)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(ice cream, be bad for dogs)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(ice cube, be good for dogs)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.57
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(ice cream, be bad for dogs)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(ice cube, be bad for dogs)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(ice cream, be bad for dogs)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(ice cube, be good for dogs)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(ice cream, be bad for dogs)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(chocolate, be bad for dogs)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(ice cream, be bad for dogs)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(cottage cheese, be good for dogs)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(ice cube, be bad for dogs)
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(ice cream, be bad for dogs)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(ice cream, be bad for dogs)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(ice cube, be good for dogs)
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(ice cream, be bad for dogs)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(ice cream, be bad for dogs)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(ice cream, be bad for dogs)
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(chocolate, be bad for dogs)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(chocolate, be bad for dogs)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(ice cream, be bad for dogs)
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(cottage cheese, be good for dogs)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(cottage cheese, be good for dogs)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(ice cream, be bad for dogs)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(ice cream, be bad for dogs)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(ice cream, be bad for dogs)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(ice cream, be bad for dogs)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(ice cream, be bad for dogs)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(ice cream, be bad for dogs)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(ice cream, be bad for dogs)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.51
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(ice cream, be bad for dogs)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(ice cube, be bad for dogs)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(ice cream, be bad for dogs)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(ice cube, be good for dogs)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(ice cream, be bad for dogs)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(chocolate, be bad for dogs)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(ice cream, be bad for dogs)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(cottage cheese, be good for dogs)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(ice cream, be bad for dogs)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(ice cube, be bad for dogs)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(ice cream, be bad for dogs)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(ice cube, be good for dogs)