ice cube: stick to tray

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents artist
Weight: 0.65
, rapper
Weight: 0.64
, beverage
Weight: 0.61
, thing
Weight: 0.60
Siblings ice skating
Weight: 0.35
, ice hockey
Weight: 0.35
, dry ice
Weight: 0.34
, ice maker
Weight: 0.34
, blob
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
stick to tray 1.00
stick in tray 1.00
get out of tray 0.95
stick in trays 0.92
stick in plastic trays 0.90

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(ice cube, stick to tray)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(ice cube, stick to tray)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(ice cube, stick to tray)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(ice cube, stick in trays)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(ice cube, stick to tray)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(ice cube, stick in trays)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(ice cube, stick to tray)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(ice cube, stick in tray)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(ice cube, stick to tray)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(ice cube, get out of tray)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(ice cube, stick to tray)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(ice cube, stick in tray)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(ice cube, stick to tray)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(ice cube, stick in trays)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(ice cube, stick to tray)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(ice cube, get out of tray)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(ice cube, stick to tray)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(ice cube, get out of tray)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(ice cube, stick to tray)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(ice cube, stick in tray)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(ice cube, stick to tray)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(ice cube, stick in tray)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(ice cube, stick to tray)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(ice cube, stick in trays)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(ice cube, stick to tray)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(ice cube, get out of tray)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(ice cube, stick to tray)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(ice cube, stick to tray)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(ice cube, stick to tray)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(ice cube, stick to tray)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(ice cube, stick to tray)