ice maker: is freezing

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents equipment
Weight: 0.63
, thing
Weight: 0.59
, water
Weight: 0.56
, refrigerator
Weight: 0.55
Siblings ice cube
Weight: 0.34
, ice hockey
Weight: 0.34
, ice skating
Weight: 0.34
, dry ice
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is freezing 1.00
is freezing up 0.96
keep up freezing 0.91

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(refrigerator, keep up freezing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(ice maker, is freezing)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(ice maker, is freezing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(refrigerator, keep up freezing)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(ice maker, is freezing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(refrigerator, keep up freezing)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(refrigerator, keep up freezing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(ice maker, is freezing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(ice maker, is freezing)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(ice maker, is freezing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(ice maker, is freezing)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(ice maker, is freezing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(ice maker, keep up freezing)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(ice maker, is freezing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(ice maker, keep up freezing)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(ice maker, is freezing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(ice maker, is freezing up)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(ice maker, is freezing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(ice maker, is freezing up)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(ice maker, is freezing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(ice maker, is freezing up)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(ice maker, is freezing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(ice maker, is freezing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(ice maker, is freezing)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(ice maker, is freezing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(ice maker, is freezing)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(ice maker, is freezing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(refrigerator, keep up freezing)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(ice maker, is freezing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(refrigerator, keep up freezing)