ice skater: have outfits

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents athlete
Weight: 0.63
, performer
Weight: 0.59
Siblings hockey player
Weight: 0.37
, gymnast
Weight: 0.35
, wrestler
Weight: 0.34
, tennis player
Weight: 0.34
, hockey
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
have outfits 1.00
wear type of clothing 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(ice skater, have outfits)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(ice skater, have outfits)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(ice skater, have outfits)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(ice skater, wear type of clothing)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(ice skater, have outfits)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(ice skater, wear type of clothing)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(ice skater, have outfits)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(ice skater, wear type of clothing)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(ice skater, have outfits)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(ice skater, wear type of clothing)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(ice skater, have outfits)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(ice skater, have outfits)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(ice skater, have outfits)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(ice skater, have outfits)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(ice skater, have outfits)