ice skating: is expensive

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents winter
Weight: 0.66
, activity
Weight: 0.61
, sport
Weight: 0.59
, event
Weight: 0.59
, thing
Weight: 0.58
Siblings rink
Weight: 0.41
, ice hockey
Weight: 0.38
, ice climbing
Weight: 0.37
, skating
Weight: 0.36
, snow skiing
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
is expensive 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.66
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(thing, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(ice skating, is expensive)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(sport, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(ice skating, is expensive)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(ice skating, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(sport, is expensive)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(ice skating, is expensive)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(thing, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(ice skating, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(sport, is expensive)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(ice skating, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(thing, is expensive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(thing, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(ice skating, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(ice skating, is expensive)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(sport, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(ice skating, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(ice skating, is expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(ice skating, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(ice skating, is expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(ice skating, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(ice skating, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(ice skating, is expensive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(ice skating, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(ice skating, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(ice skating, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(sport, is expensive)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(ice skating, is expensive)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(thing, is expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(ice skating, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(sport, is expensive)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(ice skating, is expensive)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(thing, is expensive)