iceberg: be form

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.51
, obstacle
Weight: 0.42
, object
Weight: 0.42
, ship
Weight: 0.42
, activity
Weight: 0.40
Siblings living thing
Weight: 0.30
, irony
Weight: 0.30
, battleship
Weight: 0.30
, tentacle
Weight: 0.30
, blob
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
be form 1.00
form 0.99
form in antarctica 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(iceberg, be form) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(living thing, be form)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(iceberg, be form) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(living thing, be form) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(living thing, be form)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(iceberg, be form) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(iceberg, be form)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(iceberg, be form) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(iceberg, form)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(iceberg, be form) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(iceberg, form)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(iceberg, be form) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(iceberg, form)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(iceberg, be form) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(iceberg, form)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(iceberg, be form) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(iceberg, form in antarctica)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(iceberg, be form) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(iceberg, form in antarctica)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(iceberg, be form) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(iceberg, form in antarctica)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(iceberg, be form) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(iceberg, form in antarctica)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(iceberg, be form) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(iceberg, be form) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(iceberg, be form)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(iceberg, be form) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(iceberg, be form)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(iceberg, be form) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(living thing, be form)