iceberg: be needed for wildlife in antarctica

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.51
, obstacle
Weight: 0.42
, object
Weight: 0.42
, ship
Weight: 0.42
, activity
Weight: 0.40
Siblings living thing
Weight: 0.30
, irony
Weight: 0.30
, battleship
Weight: 0.30
, tentacle
Weight: 0.30
, blob
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
be needed for wildlife in antarctica 1.00
be needed for wildlife 0.97
is freshwater 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(iceberg, be needed for wildlife in antarctica)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(iceberg, be needed for wildlife in antarctica)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(iceberg, be needed for wildlife in antarctica)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(iceberg, be needed for wildlife)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(iceberg, be needed for wildlife in antarctica)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(iceberg, be needed for wildlife)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(iceberg, be needed for wildlife in antarctica)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(iceberg, be needed for wildlife)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(iceberg, be needed for wildlife in antarctica)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(iceberg, be needed for wildlife)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(iceberg, be needed for wildlife in antarctica)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(iceberg, is freshwater)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(iceberg, be needed for wildlife in antarctica)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(iceberg, is freshwater)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(iceberg, be needed for wildlife in antarctica)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(iceberg, is freshwater)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(iceberg, be needed for wildlife in antarctica)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(iceberg, is freshwater)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(iceberg, be needed for wildlife in antarctica)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(iceberg, be needed for wildlife in antarctica)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(iceberg, be needed for wildlife in antarctica)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(iceberg, be needed for wildlife in antarctica)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(iceberg, be needed for wildlife in antarctica)