icing sugar: be in cold water

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents ingredient
Weight: 0.54
, recipe
Weight: 0.48
, good
Weight: 0.32
Siblings refined sugar
Weight: 0.35
, coconut milk
Weight: 0.33
, milk chocolate
Weight: 0.33
, lime juice
Weight: 0.33
, coconut
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in cold water 1.00
have water 0.87
call for warm water 0.85
get water 0.85
is water salty 0.82
have water in them 0.81
have inside water 0.81
get water in them 0.81
call for water 0.78
is water pink 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(recipe, call for warm water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(icing sugar, be in cold water)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(recipe, call for water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(icing sugar, be in cold water)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(icing sugar, be in cold water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(recipe, call for warm water)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(icing sugar, be in cold water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(recipe, call for water)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.49
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(icing sugar, be in cold water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(recipe, call for warm water)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(icing sugar, be in cold water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(recipe, call for water)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(icing sugar, be in cold water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(coconut, have water)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(icing sugar, be in cold water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(coconut, get water)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(icing sugar, be in cold water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(coconut, have water in them)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(icing sugar, be in cold water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(coconut, have inside water)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(icing sugar, be in cold water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(coconut, get water in them)
...

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(recipe, call for warm water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(icing sugar, be in cold water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(icing sugar, be in cold water)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(recipe, call for water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(icing sugar, be in cold water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(icing sugar, be in cold water)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(icing sugar, be in cold water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(coconut, have water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(coconut, have water)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(icing sugar, be in cold water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(coconut, get water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(coconut, get water)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(icing sugar, be in cold water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(coconut, have water in them) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(coconut, have water in them)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(icing sugar, be in cold water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(coconut, get water in them) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(coconut, get water in them)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(icing sugar, be in cold water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(coconut, is water pink) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(coconut, is water pink)
...

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(icing sugar, be in cold water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(icing sugar, be in cold water)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(icing sugar, be in cold water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(icing sugar, be in cold water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(icing sugar, be in cold water)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(icing sugar, be in cold water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(icing sugar, be in cold water)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(icing sugar, be in cold water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(recipe, call for warm water)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(icing sugar, be in cold water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(recipe, call for water)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(icing sugar, be in cold water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(coconut, have water)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(icing sugar, be in cold water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(coconut, get water)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(icing sugar, be in cold water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(coconut, have water in them)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(icing sugar, be in cold water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(coconut, get water in them)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(icing sugar, be in cold water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(coconut, have inside water)
...

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(icing sugar, be in cold water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(recipe, call for water)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(icing sugar, be in cold water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(recipe, call for warm water)