icing: is too bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.62
, condition
Weight: 0.58
, frosting
Weight: 0.51
, product
Weight: 0.51
Siblings dry ice
Weight: 0.32
, ice maker
Weight: 0.32
, ice cube
Weight: 0.32
, hot sauce
Weight: 0.32
, layer
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
is too bad 1.00
is too long bad 0.97
is long bad 0.84
has quality bad 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(icing, is too bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(ice maker, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(icing, is too bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(ice maker, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(ice maker, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(icing, is too bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(icing, is too bad)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(icing, is too bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(icing, is too long bad)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(icing, is too bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(icing, is too long bad)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(icing, is too bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(icing, is too long bad)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(icing, is too bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(icing, is too long bad)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(icing, is too bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(icing, has quality bad)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(icing, is too bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(icing, is long bad)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(icing, is too bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(icing, has quality bad)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(icing, is too bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(icing, is long bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(icing, is too bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(icing, has quality bad)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(icing, is too bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(icing, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(icing, is too bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(icing, is long bad)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(icing, is too bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(icing, is long bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(icing, is too bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(icing, is too bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(icing, is too bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(icing, is too bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(icing, is too bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(icing, is too bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(ice maker, has quality bad)