identity: be formed in long run

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents theme
Weight: 0.64
, element
Weight: 0.63
, concept
Weight: 0.62
, relation
Weight: 0.60
, mystery
Weight: 0.59
Siblings origin
Weight: 0.33
, culture
Weight: 0.33
, duality
Weight: 0.32
, dimension
Weight: 0.32
, consciousness
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be formed in long run 1.00
be formed in run 0.96
be formed 0.88

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(identity, be formed in long run) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(consciousness, be formed)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(identity, be formed in long run) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(consciousness, be formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(consciousness, be formed)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(identity, be formed in long run) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(identity, be formed in long run)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(identity, be formed in long run) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(identity, be formed in run)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(identity, be formed in long run) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(identity, be formed in run)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(identity, be formed in long run) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(identity, be formed)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(identity, be formed in long run) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(identity, be formed in run)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(identity, be formed in long run) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(identity, be formed in run)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(identity, be formed in long run) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(identity, be formed)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(identity, be formed in long run) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(identity, be formed)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(identity, be formed in long run) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(identity, be formed)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(identity, be formed in long run) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(identity, be formed in long run) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(identity, be formed in long run)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(identity, be formed in long run) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(identity, be formed in long run)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(identity, be formed in long run) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(consciousness, be formed)