idiot: has state rank

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents moron
Weight: 0.68
, person
Weight: 0.59
, insult
Weight: 0.59
, genius
Weight: 0.58
Siblings anything
Weight: 0.65
, asshole
Weight: 0.60
, reporter
Weight: 0.60
, beck
Weight: 0.59
, republican
Weight: 0.58

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state rank 1.00
be savient rank 0.96
be rank 3 bad 0.90
be savient rank 3 bad 0.90

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(idiot, has state rank) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(idiot, has state rank)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(idiot, has state rank) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(idiot, be savient rank)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(idiot, has state rank) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(idiot, be savient rank)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(idiot, has state rank) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(idiot, be savient rank)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(idiot, has state rank) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(idiot, be rank 3 bad)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(idiot, has state rank) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(idiot, be savient rank 3 bad)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(idiot, has state rank) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(idiot, be rank 3 bad)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(idiot, has state rank) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(idiot, be savient rank)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(idiot, has state rank) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(idiot, be savient rank 3 bad)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(idiot, has state rank) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(idiot, be rank 3 bad)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(idiot, has state rank) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(idiot, be savient rank 3 bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(idiot, has state rank) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(idiot, be rank 3 bad)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(idiot, has state rank) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(idiot, be savient rank 3 bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(idiot, has state rank) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(idiot, has state rank) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(idiot, has state rank)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(idiot, has state rank) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(idiot, has state rank)