illinois: be famous for meat

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents country
Weight: 0.62
, university
Weight: 0.59
, north carolina
Weight: 0.59
, michigan
Weight: 0.59
Siblings ohio
Weight: 0.64
, indiana
Weight: 0.64
, chicago
Weight: 0.63
, south carolina
Weight: 0.36
, florida
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be famous for meat 1.00
be famous for ostrich meat 0.88
is famous 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(michigan, is famous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(illinois, be famous for meat)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(illinois, be famous for meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(michigan, is famous)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(illinois, be famous for meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(michigan, is famous)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(illinois, be famous for meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(indiana, is famous)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(illinois, be famous for meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(ohio, is famous)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(illinois, be famous for meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(chicago, is famous)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(michigan, is famous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(illinois, be famous for meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(illinois, be famous for meat)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(illinois, be famous for meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(chicago, is famous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(chicago, is famous)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(illinois, be famous for meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(ohio, is famous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(ohio, is famous)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(illinois, be famous for meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(indiana, is famous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(indiana, is famous)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(illinois, be famous for meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(illinois, be famous for meat)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(illinois, be famous for meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(illinois, be famous for ostrich meat)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(illinois, be famous for meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(illinois, be famous for ostrich meat)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(illinois, be famous for meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(illinois, be famous for ostrich meat)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(illinois, be famous for meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(illinois, be famous for ostrich meat)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(illinois, be famous for meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(illinois, is famous)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(illinois, be famous for meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(illinois, is famous)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(illinois, be famous for meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(illinois, is famous)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(illinois, be famous for meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(illinois, is famous)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(illinois, be famous for meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(illinois, be famous for meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(illinois, be famous for meat)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(illinois, be famous for meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(illinois, be famous for meat)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(illinois, be famous for meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(michigan, is famous)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(illinois, be famous for meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(chicago, is famous)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(illinois, be famous for meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(indiana, is famous)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(illinois, be famous for meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(ohio, is famous)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(illinois, be famous for meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(michigan, is famous)