illinois: be in debt

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents country
Weight: 0.62
, university
Weight: 0.59
, north carolina
Weight: 0.59
, michigan
Weight: 0.59
Siblings ohio
Weight: 0.64
, indiana
Weight: 0.64
, chicago
Weight: 0.63
, south carolina
Weight: 0.36
, florida
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in debt 1.00
have debt 0.99
continually have debt crisis 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.62
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(country, have debt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(illinois, be in debt)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(country, be in debt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(illinois, be in debt)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(illinois, be in debt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(country, be in debt)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(illinois, be in debt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(country, have debt)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(illinois, be in debt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(country, be in debt)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(illinois, be in debt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(country, have debt)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(illinois, be in debt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(indiana, be in debt)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(illinois, be in debt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(chicago, be in debt)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(country, have debt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(illinois, be in debt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(illinois, be in debt)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(country, be in debt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(illinois, be in debt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(illinois, be in debt)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(illinois, be in debt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(chicago, be in debt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(chicago, be in debt)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(illinois, be in debt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(indiana, be in debt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(indiana, be in debt)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(illinois, be in debt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(illinois, be in debt)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(illinois, be in debt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(illinois, have debt)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(illinois, be in debt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(illinois, have debt)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(illinois, be in debt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(illinois, continually have debt crisis)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(illinois, be in debt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(illinois, have debt)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(illinois, be in debt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(illinois, have debt)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(illinois, be in debt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(illinois, continually have debt crisis)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(illinois, be in debt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(illinois, continually have debt crisis)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(illinois, be in debt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(illinois, continually have debt crisis)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(illinois, be in debt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(illinois, be in debt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(illinois, be in debt)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(illinois, be in debt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(illinois, be in debt)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(illinois, be in debt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(country, be in debt)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(illinois, be in debt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(country, have debt)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(illinois, be in debt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(indiana, be in debt)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(illinois, be in debt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(chicago, be in debt)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(illinois, be in debt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(country, be in debt)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(illinois, be in debt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(country, have debt)