illinois: is flat

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents country
Weight: 0.62
, university
Weight: 0.59
, north carolina
Weight: 0.59
, michigan
Weight: 0.59
Siblings ohio
Weight: 0.64
, indiana
Weight: 0.64
, chicago
Weight: 0.63
, south carolina
Weight: 0.36
, florida
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
is flat 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(illinois, is flat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(indiana, is flat)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(illinois, is flat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(florida, is flat)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(illinois, is flat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(ohio, is flat)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(illinois, is flat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(indiana, is flat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(indiana, is flat)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(illinois, is flat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(florida, is flat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(florida, is flat)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(illinois, is flat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(ohio, is flat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(ohio, is flat)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(illinois, is flat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(illinois, is flat)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(illinois, is flat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(illinois, is flat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(illinois, is flat)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(illinois, is flat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(illinois, is flat)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(illinois, is flat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(indiana, is flat)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(illinois, is flat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(ohio, is flat)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(illinois, is flat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(florida, is flat)