illiteracy: has state facts

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents problem
Weight: 0.66
, obstacle
Weight: 0.59
, challenge
Weight: 0.58
, issue
Weight: 0.58
, factor
Weight: 0.56
Siblings inequality
Weight: 0.35
, mental health problem
Weight: 0.34
, thyroid problem
Weight: 0.33
, hunger
Weight: 0.33
, overpopulation
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state facts 1.00
be with alternative facts 0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(problem, be with alternative facts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(illiteracy, has state facts)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(illiteracy, has state facts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(problem, be with alternative facts)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, has state facts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(problem, be with alternative facts)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(problem, be with alternative facts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(illiteracy, has state facts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(illiteracy, has state facts)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(illiteracy, has state facts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(illiteracy, has state facts)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(illiteracy, has state facts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(illiteracy, has state facts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, has state facts)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(illiteracy, has state facts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(illiteracy, has state facts)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, has state facts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(problem, be with alternative facts)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(illiteracy, has state facts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(problem, be with alternative facts)